In daily life we know that professionals rule the roost.
Anything remotely important is done by a profession with restricted access to
practice and many rules for practitioners -- or it is done illegitimately. Did
you undergo medical treatment last time you were ill, or did you see a
homeopath? Many activities that seem easier and safer also take on profession-like
features. Espresso making is done by a high-pressure machine, but there is still
a barista profession with formal training and certification. Researchers also
have been interested in professions, especially because their effects range
from regulating the safety and quality of important service (again, think
doctors) to restricting access to work in a way that looks like a power grab (pick
your favorite example).
So is there room for non-professionals to get things done? Gregoire Croidieu and Phillip Kim answer that question in a recent article in Administrative Science Quarterly, looking at the key role of amateurs in the development of
radio broadcasting in the US. They show that amateurs can get a significant
role if the right conditions are in place, even as professionals, companies,
and the state seek to push them to the margins. How? Well, that’s where the war,
polar exploration, and interference come in.
Let’s start with interference. Technically that is what
happens when radio transmitters are near each other in signal spectrum and physical
space, and distort each other’s transmissions. It was a major reason that many
sought to limit access to the airwaves of amateurs, especially those building
their own transmitters and behaving independently from the profession. Socially
the limitation of access was also a form of interference – trying to make it
hard to be an amateur. But radio amateurs were enthusiastically building up
their lay expertise and using it, legally or not. Except for the WWI years,
they could be given access as registered radio operators.
That brings us to the war. WWI was when radio amateurs were
blocked from the airwaves, with security given as the reason, but it did not
mean that they stopped broadcasting. They signed up for military service
instead, and fully half of the military radio operators were originally
amateurs. This was when the state recognized the value of the lay experts, and took
advantage of their skills. After the war, they were supposed to return to their
old status as marginal actors, more than before (rising to 20,000 in 1922), but
still regulated and limited. Professional radio operators still campaigned
against amateurs, seeing them as having little value.
This is where the polar explorations come into play. The amateurs
were many, highly skilled, and willing to experiment, and they soon registered
a series of technical accomplishments – including shortwave communications with
the North Pole, which had been thought impossible. The amateurs, through their
lay expertise, became leaders in radio. This role soon turned into the start of
radio as an industry and as lay culture, because the establishment of radio stations
for communicating to many – instead of point-to-point – happened in parallel. Radio
ownership and interest in radio listening rose also, and the radio broadcasting
industry eventually grew to as many radio stations as there were licensed radio
operators in 1921.
War, exploration, and interference were three of the
elements that brought amateurs to the forefront of radio, against the
resistance of professionals, companies, and the state. Clearly it was not an
easy process, and it took a lot of interest to gather the necessary momentum.
Does this show that amateurs have a clear role in society, or that they can
overcome the odds under special circumstances? We clearly need to learn more about
this so we can understand when activities become professionalized, and when
they are open to amateurs.
Croidieu, G., Kim, P.H. (2017). Labor of Love: Amateurs and Lay-expertise Legitimation in the Early U.S. Radio Field. Administrative Science Quarterly
Croidieu, G., Kim, P.H. (2017). Labor of Love: Amateurs and Lay-expertise Legitimation in the Early U.S. Radio Field. Administrative Science Quarterly