
We know surprisingly little about the answer to this question,
but now there is progress thanks to new research published in Administrative Science Quarterly by Florenta Teodoridis, Michaël Bikard, and Keyvan Vakili.
Because specialists and generalists can have different value in different
contexts, they chose one that is particularly important for firms: the
generation of knowledge through research. After all, research and development
is a budget item and a function in most firms of some size, and it is how firms
invest in their future.
To make the research conclusions especially clear, they
didn’t look at firms but at university researchers in mathematics. Unlike firm
R&D employees, mathematicians typically work alone, or when they work in
teams every team member is named in the publication. Their productivity is very
easy to measure because every important step of progress results in a
publication, and the more important publications receive more citations. And in
mathematics, something special happened: In the Soviet Union, a lot of research
on mathematics was advanced but kept secret from the West, and it was revealed
to the world when the Soviet Union collapsed. That gave mathematicians in the
rest of the world insight into theoretical mathematics that was very advanced
(areas in which Soviets were ahead) or areas that were nothing special (in
which they were even). So it was possible to measure the progress of
specialists and generalists both in fields with rapid progress and fields that
had slow progress.
The comparison was important, it turned out. Because
specialists have deep knowledge, they make the fastest progress when faced with
fast-paced research fields. They have the foundation to leap forward when
presented with significantly different knowledge than what they hold currently.
For generalists, fast-paced fields are confusing because there is too much new
knowledge to incorporate, and they have too little in-depth knowledge to make
sense of it.
But generalists can also make fast progress: they just
require slow-paced research fields. In such fields, they can use their
generalist knowledge to incorporate and integrate knowledge from outside the
specialized field, and by doing so they renew the field. That’s much harder to do for specialists, who
know little outside their field.
So now we know who is best: either specialists or
generalists, depending on the pace of the field of knowledge they enter. That
makes the choice easy for firms that know the pace of the field in which they
want to do research. It makes the choice hard for individuals, who typically
choose specialization early in life and then keep it for a long time. Personally
I would still choose specialization, because it is more fun to be ahead when
things change fast. It is also less safe, of course. Choices are never easy,
but it is good to have research that shows us the consequences.
Free article downloads are available for a limited time only:
Teodoridis, F., Bikard, M., & Vakili, K. 2018. Creativity at the Knowledge Frontier: The Impact of Specialization in Fast- and Slow-paced Domains. Administrative Science Quarterly, Forthcoming.
Thanks for Sharing a Very Nice Details about HR Generalist Regarding So It’s really help for my Knowledge Otherwise There are Some Best Training Center for HR Generalist Training.
ReplyDeleteBest Hr Generalist Training Institute in Delhi
Best Hr Generalist Training Institute in Noida
Thank you for sharing this paper. These findings are also beneficial for organizations. For example, I think Apple is a generalist, Apple did not invent Graphical User interface, Xerox did it. Apple did not invent MP3 (Ipod), a South Korean company SaeHan did it. Apple did not invent the first smartphone, IBM did it in 1994. Likewise, the more recent facial recognition system, apple watch, beats earphones are not invented by Apple. But Apple takes advantage of these technology advances and enjoys huge business success.
ReplyDeleteCompared with IBM, Google, or Microsoft, Apple invests much less in R&D. However, Apple stays alert with what is happening in technology world and adopts new technologies to achieve huge business success. Apple is an exemplary generalist.